Showing posts with label Livepool FC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Livepool FC. Show all posts

Friday, May 28, 2021

How the Autopsy of LFC’s Black Swans Became a Celebration of Overcoming the Odds by Paul Tomkins

 

 

The “Black Swan”: that event so freakishly rare you rarely see them.

As I’ve noted throughout the season, pretty much the only swans seen at Liverpool Football Club in 2020/21 were of the jet-black variety (with all the sheep mysteriously that variety too). In this bizarro world, perhaps there has been a proliferation of white widow spiders, white crows and white jaguars; and of course, throw in some pink giraffes and green elephants, just to make it all the more trippy.

I had been preparing to point out how these Black Swans killed Liverpool’s Champions League qualification hopes, and yet despite more setbacks than you’d probably expect in 20 seasons, the Reds clawed their way back from the brink of mid-table, to finish 3rd. They did so minus all their senior centre-backs – fielding their 7th and 8th choices – and their leader and captain, amongst other absentees in the run-in; having had long-term injuries to various other players.

It will never be Jürgen Klopp’s most celebrated achievement, but it could be his most impressive.

Indeed, as the corpses of Black Swans littered the Anfield area in this era of plague and pestilence, we got to see something even rarer: a flying Golden Griffin, complete with gloved talons, as Alisson Becker channeled his inner mythic beast to head home the goal that potentially earned the Reds in excess of £50m and, more importantly, the cachet of elite football – and most vital of all, the chance to win next year’s Champions League (or, to at least enjoy some big Anfield nights that transcend the “ropey” league).

The Golden Griffin swooped, and for the first time in nearly 6,000 games of football in Liverpool’s history, and perhaps getting close to 100,000 top-flight games in England since the inception of league football in Victorian times, a goalkeeper scored the winning goal in a game (as well as, I believe, becoming the first to score at that level with a header – most of them have been long clearances that caught the wind).

In that moment the last living Black Swans fell from the sky, dropping dead to the ground.

Diagnosing Disaster

Working out what was going wrong – in a football sense – in a season when so many factors were having an influence was almost impossible. I compared it to trying to diagnose one specific illness from an inexhaustible list of symptoms.

People would pick one simplistic (and often incorrect) thing and focus on it: “Thiago slows Liverpool down”.

Yet this didn’t explain why, during the midseason slump, the Reds were still creating good chances from open play – just a) missing them (was that Thiago’s fault?); but b) no longer creating them from set-pieces (and he neither took the corners, nor was expected to be on the end of them).

This is an image from a few months ago, at the peak of the “Thiago slows Liverpool down” nonsense. You can barely see his name, as he’s almost literally off the top of the chart.

They saw the addition of Thiago coinciding with the slump, but didn’t note the loss of the third and final major centre-back as a far more decisive moment; especially at a time when Nat Phillips and Rhys Williams had one Premier League start between them. At that point, Liverpool were top of the league.

Both came into the side and had harrowing games that perhaps suggested they were not ready for the deep end; but while they appeared to be drowning, they were simply learning to swim in public. Fabinho (and even Jordan Henderson) at centre-half made sense in that the others did not appear ready; Ozan Kabak, who arrived in an emergency deal, was himself only 20, and he had to get up to pace with the Premier League with zero time to adjust. (He did very well considering, even if he didn’t quite convince the higher-ups at Liverpool that he was ready for a permanent deal.)

Thiago had his ups and downs this season, after returning from open-knee surgery performed by a snarling Brazilian, but slowing Liverpool down was never true. He made too many fouls, and at times his lack of pace (and fitness after injury) caused optical alarm (he appeared to be too sluggish), but he always made the ball do more forward-thinking work than any other midfielder in the country. And as the season progressed, he increasingly bossed games. Vitally, he was able to have a bodyguard in Fabinho – although he continued to battle for the ball and win a surprising number of headers.

Such an explanation – Thiago was the problem – ignored that lack of stability at the other end, with a different goalkeeper and centre-back pairing almost every game. Liverpool used twenty different centre-back pairings, and thirty different rearguard trios (GK-CB-CB).

Such narratives ignored ten or twenty other important factors.

They ignored that injuries to the two main goalscoring midfielders from open play: Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain and Naby Keïta; the two who would run ahead of the strikers.

That pair also happen to be elite pressers, too (Keïta remains the best at the club, but he needs to get an injury specialist to sort him out. He remains a fantastic player, but at this stage cannot be relied upon. I wouldn’t write him off, but I wouldn’t bank on him either. My view is that you try to limit the churn in the transfer market, and work on getting talented fringe players to challenge for starting berths; as seen at Manchester City this season, with İlkay Gündoğan, John Stones and João Cancelo, amongst others whose form completely switched this season).

Another elite presser was Diogo Jota, the league’s best marksman in terms of shots on target per game, who missed three months. Indeed, Liverpool had just two games where a total of four serious long-term knee injuries were sustained. These two games alone cost Liverpool c.100 appearances (from Virgil van Dijk, Thiago, Jota and Tsimikas: three major players, and one much-needed backup).

The narrative ignored how Liverpool were not being given penalties (an ongoing trend), but were conceding them at an unusually high rate (a new trend). Despite doing two thirds of the attacking, the Reds conceded more penalties than they won.

The four teams vying with Liverpool for the top four each won between 9-12 league penalties, ranking #1-4. Liverpool ranked joint 7th, level with several other clubs, to mean that every single season has seen Klopp rank lower on penalties won than league position (as did Rafa Benítez), while every single season in the top flight has seen Brendan Rodgers rank higher in penalties won than league finish.

While that may be merely coincidental in Rodgers’ case, there is this very weird pattern where not only do British players get favoured in both boxes by referees (based on in-depth studies we’ve undertaken), but the teams of British managers seem to fare much better too – it certainly applies to Liverpool: Benítez, lower every year; Rodgers, higher every year (ditto Dalglish and Hodgson); Klopp, lower every year.

(The absolutely scandalous diving by Jamie Vardy explains some of this recent trend: the most egregious one I’ve ever seen was how he grabbed Davison Sanchez’s arm and then threw himself to the ground. What next? Vardy to get hold of a centre-back’s hand and thrust it into his face, to pretend he’s just been punched? All teams have players who go down easily, but this is some new-level conniving, that the VAR inexplicably failed to recognise, when all neutrals could see it a mile off.)

For the second season running a relegated team won more penalties than Liverpool, who had the best attacking xG figures in the top division.

Again, this makes no logical sense. (And no opposition player has been sent off at Anfield for several years now; Jordan Ayew continued the trend of players staying on despite at least two bookable offences.)

One thing we studied on this site was how officials from the north-west show a clear bias against Liverpool, and that the closer to Liverpool their hometown, the more biased they are; as if it’s a bend-over-backwards bias that is so prevalent in modern society (trying too hard to look unbiased, as the optics are all the counts).

With subscriber “CVT” and old friend Rob Radburn, we created this interactive chart (click this link for the longer and fully interactive version):

As you will see from the full version, the three least generous refs are all examples of officiating Liverpool matches, and most referees – when it comes to their treatment of Liverpool – rank towards the foot of the table. The only active referee who is even remotely generous to Liverpool is Michael Oliver, whilst the older the refs are (and the more north-west their place of origin), the worse things get on average.

(Note: data was correct up to March, and as such, no further penalties or red cards were awarded in Liverpool’s favour. In fairness, Anthony Taylor did award one, but Paul Tierney overruled it.)

This overly harsh treatment by north-west refs would explain why, in a season when north-west refs did most of their games due to Covid-19, the officiating got even more punishing. While we must all be aware of our own biases (mine are pretty clear!), we must also be aware of bias overcorrections, which are about appeasing the masses, and not being honest. We have to correct for our biasses, but not overcorrect to look virtuous and just.

Outrage on social media leads to a lot of accusations of bias in all areas of life (and sport), and so people veer towards anti-bias virtue signalling. People will accuse Mike Dean of favouring Liverpool, yet he remains a nightmare for the Reds in terms of big decision balance (excluding VAR interventions). Dean gives tons of penalties, but he’s given none for Liverpool, and two against (one was outside the box, but he gave the foul).

My aim has always been to mine the data, not work on raw emotion (although I also tweet some absolute horseshit in times of high stress, which, along with the toxic nature of social media in general, is part of the reason why I try to avoid those places these days. It thrives on our worst instincts).

Anthony Taylor, from Manchester, has bottled some big decisions for Liverpool (most famously at Man City in 2019), but has awarded the Reds a healthy six penalties, albeit with one overturned by the VAR from Wigan. While we may recall the Vincent Kompany assault on Salah that only resulted in a yellow card (and helped tip the title in City’s favour) and think he’s biased against Liverpool, he’s actually a fair ref, according to the data. Again, the optics are what we remember – the high-profile events. The data is what reveals the bigger picture.

I would put Taylor with Oliver and Andre Marriner as the only three refs who are even vaguely fair to Liverpool. (The Premier League and the PGMOL may be aware of which referees favour which teams when appointing them. It certainly felt like they were trying to handicap Liverpool this season, to the point where favourable refs were replaced at the last moment by unfavourable refs in the run-in. That’s not to say it’s a conspiracy, just that I wouldn’t necessarily trust either the Premier League or the PGMOL, with their rampant self-interests.)

Liverpool had to dig themselves out of a hole without a single penalty after early February, which was itself the only penalty since December 13th, as refs and VARs otherwise dished them out left, right and centre. As ever, Michael Oliver was the only referee who gave Liverpool a vaguely logical number of penalties, based on the data. He gave the Reds three this season, and all were correct decisions; no other ref gave more than one.

The simplistic narratives ignored the lack of a home crowd, which turned Liverpool’s best-ever home record (four years without defeat, which still applies if you exclude three-quarters of a season in an empty stadium) into the club’s worst-ever run, in a season which – for the first ever time across the whole top flight – saw more away wins than home wins. Burnley also suffered their worst ever home run, and Everton and Manchester United had their worst home runs for many, many decades. Manchester City won the league, and lost a fairly hefty four of 19 games at home; yet adding together the previous three title winners (Liverpool, City and City) saw just two home defeats in 57 league games in those three seasons. So, the lack of crowd was clearly a big factor too.

Simple one-fact narratives don’t even cover the way the Reds’ preseason – already truncated – was thrown into chaos by last-minute changes to the training camp location due to Covid issues. They do not cover the lack of fitness in the squad as a result, and how, with up to a dozen injuries at a time, rotation was harder; and therefore fatigue in the middle of the campaign became an issue for some players in a more heavily-packed schedule.

Andy Robertson desperately needed cover, but his cover got Covid and then a serious knee injury; and when his cover was fit again, Klopp essentially admitted he couldn’t really change much of the core of the team, due to the ever-changing centre-back pairings. The manager could have given more minutes to Kostas Tsimikas had it not been two rookie centre-halves, who needed Robertson’s know-how alongside them, and a settled midfield ahead of them.

Robertson was clearly knackered, but normal rotation was out, as Klopp strove for stability. And he was proven correct to do so, albeit in a gamble that could have gone either way (as is the case with all judgement calls).

The simple narratives do not include the insane balance of VAR calls that went against the Reds, mainly in the periods when the team was struggling. Seven decisions went in their favour, but a whopping thirteen went against. Of these 13, some were as clear as day – but about half were scarcely believable.

I’m not being wise after the event. I have been tracking these things all season on TTT, with the help of Andrew Beasley, Daniel Rhodes and others. This has been a shocking outlier of a season, and the notion that these were Mentality Midgets and not Mentality Monsters has been disproved beyond all doubt.

The Biggest Factor

But if I had to pick one single factor – or rather, the biggest contributing factor – then aside from often lacking so many world-class players (whose value often exceeded £300m, which meant the Reds had more financial investment in the treatment room than on the pitch), I’d say that a lack of height (itself due to those injuries) was killing the Reds.

Possession stats had not changed much, open-play xG stats had not changed much, referees were still not giving Liverpool many penalties, but set-pieces at both ends (and an inability to win headers in the middle of the park) were – to my mind – behind the slump against big-bastard teams.

They just happened to be the “smaller” clubs, which incorrectly implied that the Reds just weren’t up for it; but these little clubs had the tall, bodybuilder players that overpowered Liverpool’s technicians in the absence of the Reds’ enforcers (and fair refereeing).

They played aerial percentage football that was Liverpool’s Achilles heel (if only there was an Achilles head). These alehouse units played the kind of football that Joel Matip, Virgil van Dijk and Fabinho (as a midfielder) were brought in to combat.

The most simple are startling statistic I can find is the disparity between when Liverpool – overall the shortest team in the league this season (and by an even greater margin when you look only at outfield players) – were at their smallest, and when they were at their tallest (which wasn’t even within an inch of the average of the tallest side, Manchester United).

“Shortest Liverpool” had relegation form, over a run of 13 games. PPG: 0.8, or 29.2 for the season. Or, the same as Fulham.

“Taller Liverpool” had league-winning form, over a run of 25 games. PPG: 2.3, or 89.7 for the season. Or, better than Manchester City.

It’s that simple. (Even if it’s not really that simple, as nothing ever is.)

But the stats really are that startling.

(Another thing: Man City added height to their team this season, and fielded taller centre-backs than last season, and Rodri won an absolute ton of headers, to rank 4th in the entire division, while John Stones has improved in the air with age and experience, and ranked in the top 10.)

However, which Premier League player ended the season winning the most aerial duels as a percentage? Rhys Williams.

Which player’s inclusion in the team suddenly increased the set-ball threat at the other end? Rhys Williams.

Nat Phillips, four years his senior, is clearly more aggressive, and goes for less-winnable duels, and helps in this regard too, as he’s in the top 75 percentile for centre-backs; but Williams is just bloody tall.

Williams won over 82% of his duels, and he contested almost 40. That is an elite figure, and the only player I’ve seen better it in recent years is Joel Matip, with 90% last season (from 46 duels).

Who ranked 2nd last season? Virgil van Dijk, at 80%. Who ranked 1st the season before? Virgil van Dijk.

As good – and honest – as Ozan Kabak has been, he’s just 6’1″. He won just 55% of his aerial duels this season, and whilst Fabinho is good in the air for a midfield (in that he’s tall for a midfielder), he’s substandard in the air as a centre-back. (Indeed, he doesn’t even go up for corners anymore.)

Most young players improve in aerial duels as they get more experienced and beef up a bit. Their timing improves, their ability to use their body improves, and they gain power from the gym. But height seems key. (Note: as ever, set-piece goals exclude penalties.)

Williams was also standing right next to Roberto Firmino in December when the Brazilian headed that remarkable winner against Spurs. That was the last set-piece goal the Reds would score until Williams returned to the side for the final five league games.

The Reds won all five, and scored their first set-piece goal for five months. Coincidence?

They also scored their 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th set-piece goals since the game after that Spurs fixture back in 2020.

Coincidence?

This was after an admittedly Black Swan run of no set-piece goals for five months. There was one more set-piece goal after Firmino’s against Spurs in December: the next game, when Mo Salah headed home. This was also Matip’s last full game, and Matip – 6’5″ – headed the assist, before he got injured again in the next game at West Brom (when Liverpool threw away a 1-0 lead after his exit, and the slump started).

According to Andrew Beasley, between Salah’s goal against Crystal Palace and Diogo Jota’s at Old Trafford, there was a gap of 2,383 minutes and 91 set-piece shots without a goal, across a shit-ton (my technical term) of free-kicks and 183 corners. The quality of the balls into the box wasn’t necessarily different, as both full-backs played all these games – albeit after Covid and injuries, Trent Alexander-Arnold was looking sluggish. The balls were whipped into the danger areas, and Liverpool had no height to contest them. Smaller players can score from set-pieces, but rarely if the opposition’s tallest players have no tall players to mark, so mark them instead.

That five-month drought saw Liverpool field mostly shorter centre-back pairings, and that meant an increase in set-piece goals conceded, too. The dip in height correlates directly with the slump in results, albeit height won’t have been the only factor; it just feels like the main factor to me.

While I haven’t done so, if you overlaid the league table, it might look quite similar! The Reds started the season as the best team (and were top until all the senior centre-backs fell to injury), and ended the season as the best team.

As I said, surely other factors applied, including that the stand-in centre-backs were not always specialist centre-backs (and when the average was lower earlier in the season it was with the elite-paced Joe Gomez, 6’2″), but from the ten league games where the Reds fielded centre-backs who averaged below 188cms in height, they took just 0.6 points per game, with just one win: against West Ham away. Centre-back pairings 188cm or taller resulted in title-winning form.

Now, I admit that this is an area of fascination for me, but I’m not cherry-picking the data.

For many years I’ve been talking about the importance of aerial duels in English football. I started focussing on it in 2015, when the Reds were the smallest team, and the worst in the air by some distance.

It’s even more important if your strikers and midfielders are superb but small. You wouldn’t swap Mo Salah for Ashley Barnes because one is a giant bodybuilder and the other is 5’9″, but if over 30% of goals are from set-pieces, then you end up essentially gifting results to the opposition if you cannot compete on them. Brendan Rodgers tried to add height in Christian Benteke, but it was at the expense of quality. (Benteke was excellent at Aston Villa until he suffered a serious injury that robbed him of pace.)

Remember, Liverpool’s 13 shortest starting XIs in 2020/21 scored zero set-piece goals, and conceded five, and had relegation-form results.

You don’t need a tall team per se, but you need four or five tall players to handle the aerial onslaughts. This is why Man City bought Rodri, and Stones scored four goals as well as improving defensively. In the last two seasons they have bought several players who are 6ft or taller.

Rhys Williams – as tall as Joel Matip, and aged just 19 until fairly recently – started seven Premier League games, and the Reds won six of them. The Reds scored a staggering c.60% of their set-piece goals in these seven games (and the other 40% came via goals or assists by van Dijk and Matip). The age of 19/20 is an absolute baby for centre-backs, where almost all players (especially what I call Slow Giants) start to look the part at 24/25.

Williams and Phillips both clearly lack pace, and both lack experience. Both are Slow Giants, and the last thing you want is to pair a Slow Giant with a Slow Giant. So how did they succeed? It seems that Liverpool had enough quality, just not enough height. Ozan Kabak and Fabinho are quicker than both, yet it seemed that height was the missing factor.

While Phillips seems to be the chaos-monster, Williams is the unmarkable object. Phillips’ aggression helps, without doubt. He’s the one that goes looking for the duels, and will head a 50-50 even if the ball is on the ground. But Williams is just a giant, and one who will surely only improve in the air with time spent on the pitch (and in the weights room). I was lucky enough to be at Anfield on Sunday, and I really appreciated his composure and touch, as well as how he caused chaos in the Crystal Palace area (and Palace are one of the league’s tallest teams, as well as being its oldest. You can count on Roy Hodgson bequeathing a team aged 30 to his successor, time after time).

Incredibly, Roberto Firmino has now outscored Virgil van Dijk from set-pieces since the summer of 2018, albeit van Dijk has played only two full seasons in that time.

But Firmino cannot score from set-pieces without a giant or two to act as distractions. It doesn’t even need an elite aerial threat like van Dijk; it just needs some bloody tall kid, to get in the mix. Being 6’4″ or 6’5″ makes a huge difference to aerial win percentages, and it makes flick-ons at corners all the more likely. Years ago I worked out that the best aerial win percentages belong, on average, to the very tallest players (if you group them by height), and they fall in line with every inch lost in height.

Peter Crouch was not a wonderful technical header of the ball, nor could he jump that high. But he was (and presumably still is) 6’7″, and thus scored the most headed goals in the modern era.

When Firmino headed home the diagonal free-kick against Man United a few weeks ago, Williams was initially standing right next to him, taking up the attention of three tall United players, despite the fact that Williams has no clear aerial ability in terms of heading at goal (as we saw when unmarked this weekend). Three men on (or near) Williams left one player (Paul Pogba) half-marking Firmino at the far post as he stole a march.

Below is Firmino heading home against Spurs, with Williams (ducking) helping him to create a two-on-one.

When Liverpool broke through against Palace at the weekend, it was Williams heading the ball on to Firmino after getting above the tall Cheikhou Kouyaté; perhaps by accident, but there they were again, the same pair linking up. Kouyaté failed to jump, and tried to foul Williams, to no avail. He did stop Williams from heading at goal, but the ball fell to Firmino.

Williams was involved in the set-piece goal against United – before Firmino’s – that broke the five-month drought. He was the one who was challenged by David de Gea and not one but two United defenders, which meant space for other players. Three United players against Williams, and the ball fell to Mo Salah in space in the box.

Williams also helped win the penalty from a corner that was bizarrely overruled (yes, Eric Bailly won the ball, but it was not won cleanly, and the follow-through was extreme – far more of a penalty than Fabinho’s challenge outside the box against Sheffield United!).

At 0-0 at Burnley, Williams headed down from a corner and Phillips somehow volleyed over. It was a golden chance. Williams didn’t even need to jump.

When Mané set up the vital second goal in that game, from a 2nd-phase corner, he lofted the cross directly over Williams’ head at the near post, as the Reds’ no.46 stood surrounded by Burnley players; in snuck an unmarked Phillips to finally show that he can be a threat in the opposition box too, after various wild attempts.

All this is under the radar, with Phillips and Mané getting the plaudits; yet Williams is taking up the attentions of half the home team. You could argue, via the image below, that five players are stationed to deal with Williams, and just one (Ben Mee) has to mark both Phillips and Firmino, as well as being one of the five in a position to challenge Williams (whilst Salah lurks at the back post too).

And when Williams went off late-on against West Brom, it was the Reds’ 6’4″ keeper, challenging for the ball along with the aggressive Reds’ 6’3″ heading-machine, that won the game and essentially banished the Black Swans. There was a height overload at the back post, and it turned Liverpool’s fortunes around, and gave us the best moment of the season by far.

While delivery is obviously important, height is absolutely vital at attacking set-pieces – and sometimes it can be the goalkeeper, too. It’s similar to how a quick striker often just needs a half-decent through-ball and he can turn it into a killer pass: a tall player doesn’t necessarily need the perfect cross.

It’s hard to quantify how much better Thiago did with “bodyguards”, but he started the season looking sublime in a team containing van Dijk, Fabinho and Henderson, and then had a slump in a short-arsed midfield, with issues at centre-back.

One other issue during the slump was just how bad the Reds’ finishing was, but this was also partly linked to height and set-pieces. Remember, Firmino gets a lot of his goals as the free man when taller Liverpool players are being marked. He’s the one that finds the space. A lack of set-piece goals put more pressure on the strikers, and for a while they were weighed down. At the other end, the Reds conceded from set-pieces, and conceded penalties that cost a lot of points.

The law of averages suggested Liverpool’s fortunes in front of goal would change, and they did. Sometimes you just have to ride out the storm. Next season, Liverpool should have elite tall players back in the team, as well as (hopefully) other players being fit again. But now, the Reds also have Williams and Phillips, two rookies who helped transform the season. The worst season in a decade turned into one of the best run-ins, and in the absence of up to a dozen players at a time, new heroes were born.

Part Two

Some crazy Black Swan stats, many compiled by Andrew Beasley, often at my request.

Injuries

Defensive Chaos

Penalties Won

Officiating and VAR

Quick Officiating Lowlights Reel via Twitter

(Complete with terrible music)

https://twitter.com/lverpull/status/1396792221559558147?s=21

Summary

The Golden Griffin killed all the Black Swans.

The end.

This is a free article, but The Tomkins Times has existed since 2009 due to paid subscribers who take part in the troll-free paywalled debate (and get access to subscriber-only material), so see details below on how to sign up. Also, we have a free Substack newsletter that sends highlights from TTT to your inbox, which you can register for here.

Wednesday, March 31, 2021

A Damning Indictment of English Referees Regarding Foreign Players by Paul Tomkins

 https://tomkinstimes.com/2021/03/a-damning-indictment-of-english-referees-regarding-foreign-players/

 

I have spent the past month working continually on a project to assess the fairness of referees,  including various potential biases they may have, and which players and teams they seem to favour and which they seem to punish. 

I am still unsure of when to publish the whole study, for which, with the help of various people, I’ve mined tons of data. 

As well as with TTT’s regular writers (including Andrew Beasley), I have been working with a high-level graduate of Harvard and Oxford who works as a project leader at one of the world’s biggest businesses (TTT subscriber CVT123), as well as another academic currently at Oxford University, on the findings. (With erstwhile Tableau Zen Master Robert Radburn doing some data visuals, in addition to my more simple spreadsheet outputs.) Basically, it could now easily make for an academic study, and having been asked about considering that route, I’m currently pondering whether to take it to that level. 

Having been driven to distraction by the officiating these past few seasons, and the apparently botched introduction of VAR (albeit some teething problems are to be expected), I wanted to actually find out if my frustrations were based on reality. I’m sure the same applies to the others who helped with this study. I’m sure we all have our own biases too, but the data has to be allowed to speak for itself. No subjective data was used. The only subjectivity was by the officials.

In the past month I’ve written several 5,000-word pieces that are still gathering metaphorical dust on my hard-drive because, as soon as I reach a conclusion, I think of other variables to check, and find more data to mine, or new ways to filter the data at my disposal. Sometimes it strengthens my hypothesis, and sometimes it weakens it. Either way, it’s like a rabbit hole of never-ending possibilities to check. (And I don’t want to spend the rest of my life sifting through it, lest the last of my sanity be drained away, along with my will to live.)

I want to get this right. I want to be fair to the referees, who have a very difficult job, but also point out the bad ones or their overall biases.  

A lot of the preliminary findings are damning of Premier League officials, and show what appear to be strong biases, and in some cases, anti-biases, as they try and bend over backwards in certain situations to try to not look biased (which everyone has to do in modern society). 

For instance, if Liverpool are officiated by a referee from the North-west then the Reds’ positive decisions diminish massively – but with one Mancunian referee (Anthony Taylor) more likely to give Liverpool positive decisions than the North-west refs who hail from closer to Merseyside.

Indeed, across a sample of 68 games since Klopp took charge, referees from the North-west absolutely hammer Liverpool on the whole, compared against all the other referees. (And by ‘hammer’, that is also compared to how those same referees officiate other big clubs.)

Similarly, age seems to play a big role in Liverpool’s case: older referees are also incredibly harsh on the Reds overall, with those born after the old myths about the Kop winning penalties and influencing refs less likely to show a desire to avoid all big decisions at Anfield. There’s a provable home/away difference in officiating across all clubs in the study, and other anomalies. But that’s all for another time.

(One thing that was clear from the data is that Liverpool have a ton of “absent penalties” compared to all their rivals since Jürgen Klopp arrived in 2015, even if Liverpool, in the first 12 years of the Premier League, won an excess of penalties – but that doesn’t help this manager, these owners, these players and the current fans who are paying emotionally and financially to follow their team. Referees clearly officiate Liverpool very differently from the other five major contenders I studied regarding the number of decisions they make, based on tons of data from every single game, and they almost go “on strike” at Anfield. But I’ll save that stuff for another time too.)

Going back a couple of years, I had already studied the 600+ penalties given in the Premier League between 2011 and 2019, and found disparities between the awards given at both ends to British players and overseas players, with the British less harshly treated based on the percentage of minutes played. For that old study, with help from volunteers, we simply listed the team, the player fouled, that player’s nationality, and then the name and nationality of the fouling player. Then, as with everything in this much more expanded study, I am not factoring in whether penalties and sendings off were “correct”. 

This is purely based on big data, and the belief that biases will show up in the numbers.  

(That said, we have prepared videos of some of the decisions affecting Liverpool in the last two seasons, although this is not a study skewed towards Liverpool in any way, albeit we will focusing on the results that affect the club we write about. We want to highlight some of these “absent penalties”.)

One thing I wanted to do this time was to expand on that 2019 work, and to split it down further, to see if English players benefited more than Scottish, Welsh and Irish players; to see if English referees benefited their “own” more readily, and also, to see if England internationals appeared to get extra preferential treatment. So, this was all underway – albeit I was drowning in data and in the challenge of turning it into comprehensible articles. 

But today has seen a development. Ex-referee boss Keith Hackett has been talking about how Jürgen Klopp has to inform Mo Salah to stop diving – so I thought it was worth looking again at how foreign players are treated at both ends of the pitch, and leaving the rest of the officiating study (which teams win a greater or lesser number of big decisions than expected; which refs are kinder/harsher to certain teams, and the role age and birth location plays; and things like home vs away biases, etc.) to another time.

Indeed, Liverpool played for seasons with their front three of Roberto Firmino, Sadio Mané and Salah, and had Virgil van Dijk, Alisson and Joel Matip at the heart of the defence, they were primed to be hit hard by any potential anti-English bias from English refs. And with Jordan Henderson and James Milner as midfielders, the team’s “Britishness” was often confined to wider and more central midfield areas – although both Andy Robertson and Trent Alexander-Arnold got into the opposition box more than some attacking midfielders at other clubs. 

Whilst I will – in one form or another – publish all the data for all the issues in the full study in due course, for now this is a very Liverpool specific piece on the issue that affects the club to an outsized degree. That said, it also affects the players of other clubs, too – and hopefully the study, as a whole, will prove informative to fans of all clubs and neutrals alike (and if any non-Liverpool fans want to do a similar study or to try and replicate our results, I’d encourage it).

Expected Penalties

First of all, TTT subscriber “CVT” created an expected penalties model based on the number of Penalty Box Touches (PBT) of the ten English players who win the most penalties*, to set that as a baseline against which similarly (if not additionally) talented foreign players could be judged, as well as everyone else. The r2 correlation was 0.92 (or 92%), with anything above 0.75 considered “substantial” (according to a quick google of interpreting the results). 

*Four or more since the start of 2017/18, with all data on PBT collated from the superb https://fbref.com/en/

In other words, for these ten English players – henceforth known as The English Ten – the relationship between the number of touches in the opposition penalty area and the number of penalties won is very strong. Indeed, remove the outlier Jesse Lingard (not to be confused with The Outlaw Jesse James) and the r2 goes up to 0.982, or almost 100%. Give these players between 30-80 touches in opposition areas and they’ll get a penalty. 

The English Ten are: Raheem Sterling, Wilfried Zaha*, Jamie Vardy, Callum Wilson, Marcus Rashford, Dominic Calvert-Lewin, Jesse Lingard, Danny Ings, Glenn Murray and James Maddison. (Harry Kane won a penalty the evening after we collated the data!) On average, they get a penalty every 73 PBT, with Lingard averaging one every 38 PBT.

*As with my 2019 study, I’ve counted Zaha as English, as he played 17 times for England age-group sides and twice for the full team, and has been in England since a young child. As such, I would expect referees to treat him as English, just as they would Raheem Sterling, who moved to England at a similar age, but who stayed with the English national team. (Which is not to diminish Zaha’s allegiance to Ivory Coast, but he was an England international first.)

So, based on this analysis, we can say that The English Ten win penalties at a fair rate (based on the correlation between touches and awards), albeit some are a bit below the line and some are above. The problem is, almost no one else wins penalties at that fair rate. 

A lucky few overseas players do, but on the whole, they are much less likely to be given penalties, even though The English Ten are not exclusively brilliant attacking players. Several are (Sterling and Zaha, for instance); some are not. Glenn Murray was slow and big; Jesse Lingard is small and fast; Danny Ings is dedicated and more than decent, but not world-class by any measure. Whilst no one can live up to the high bar of “fairness”, it’s interesting to see the margins by which everyone else falls short. 

The clear problem is that once you overlay all the foreign players to win four or more penalties since 2017 onto the same fairness line, they fall short. Timo Werner, the Teutonic attacker who is struggling for goals – but not in terms of winning penalties – is a clear exception. Paul Pogba also wins more than expected, whilst Anthony Martial is the only foreign player to win a lot of penalties (more than four) at the same rate as The English Ten, which we have decreed as the fair amount. 

However. Add Mohamed Salah, Riyad Mahrez, Roberto Pereyra, Sadio Mané, Alexandre Lacazette and Richarlison, as the other overseas players to win more than four, and they slide to the “harshly treated” side of the graph like the capsizing Titanic. Indeed, I asked to have Roberto Firmino added to the graphic too, as the Premier League player to have won the fewest penalties based on his expected totals: one from 785 PBTs, which would lead to 10 penalties for certain English players, some of whom are far less skilful. (For someone who drops deep a lot, Firmino is also in the box a lot, too. He’s everywhere.)

Which means, Liverpool have three outliers, all harshly punished. Of course, some players haven’t even won a penalty, and Firmino aside, the qualifying limit was four. 

You could add the Portuguese Diogo Jota, yet to win a penalty despite 401 touches in opposition penalty areas since his debut in the top-flight with Wolves (over 50 of them with the Reds), and Liverpool have a quartet who, since 2017, win a penalty once every 213 PBT, compared with 38 PBTs for Lingard, 52 for Glenn Murray, and 73 for The English Ten. And I would argue that Salah, Jota, Firmino and Mané are, on average, better than The English Ten, if not not necessarily better than every member of The English Ten (that is debatable). Indeed, I think we can “prove” that with data, as I will come on to. 

Or maybe that quartet of Liverpool’s just aren’t very good, or quick, or skilful, right? Murray and Mané both have four Premier League penalties since 2017, but Mané needed four times as many touches to win them. Obviously that’s because Murray was the Lionel Messi of English football.

Brazilian Attackers Are Rubbish, Right?

Everyone knows that Brazilians can’t play football. And African attackers aren’t that good, either. Everyone knows that Jesse Lingard, Glenn Murray and James Maddison would all start for the Brazilian national side, even when at its best. 

This is where it all gets worrying in the data. While I won’t step too far into the minefield issue of race (other than to say that English players of all races seem fairly evenly treated), there seems a strong xenophobic stench in the data from how refs treat players who did not grow up in England. 

“Foreign-ness” seems more of an issue, given that plenty of non-white English players win a lot of penalties – although being foreign and darker-skinned may be even more of a punishment – but that’s for other people to decide. However, for the purposes of this study we have stuck to nationalities, which are more easily defined, rather than race, which, in contrast to place of birth and country represented, is not listed in major databases. For the record, due to their varied smaller sample sizes as individual countries, African players have been grouped together – which is not to say, in any way, that all Africans are the same, but they may be viewed as such by certain referees in terms of their “otherness”.

As an aside, I’ve previous shown when studying just Liverpool, that the Reds have won far more penalties since 2002 when the team has been full of British players, and that a British manager helps, too (albeit perhaps because they prefer British players). The only exception was Gérard Houllier’s side of 2002-2004, which had fallen dramatically from its exciting 2000-2002 heights, but still ranked 2nd and 3rd in the Premier League for penalties won in those two seasons, thanks to a heavily English team. Liverpool’s penalties last spiked in 2013/14, when seven of the 12 were won by fouls on British players (plus three on Luis Suarez, and two handballs where nationality was not taken into account), with British boss Brendan Rodgers in charge. In 12 seasons at the helm since 2002, no foreign Liverpool manager has seen his side finish as high in the penalty rankings as they have in the league table; whereas no British manager has finished lower. So this suspicion has been with me for years. The more I parse the data across the whole Premier League, the clearer it seems to become. (Indeed, the only noticeable change was in 2019/20, following my 2019 articles on the subject, before things returned to “normal” this season.)

The fact that Brazilians are three times less likely to win a penalty per 1,000 PBTs than a German, and 2.5 less likely than an Irishman, is worrying. African players are the next most harshly treated. (Good job Liverpool don’t have any Brazilian or African attackers, eh?)

English players need half the penalty box touches of Brazilians to win a penalty, while Africans need 50% more PBT than English players to get a spot-kick. 

(Despite English and British players being booked far more frequently for diving than Brazilian or African players. I found this date: 2015-2019 yellow cards for simulation: 4 – Wilfried Zaha; 3 – Dele Alli, James McArthur; 2 Sadio Mané, Raheem Sterling, Pedro, Adam Smith, Leroy Sané, Joshua King, Martin Olsson, Roberto Pereyra, Pierre-Emile Højbjerg, Shkodran Mustafi, Daniel James. In his time with Liverpool, Salah has been booked just once for diving.)

(For the record, these are the most harshly treated players in the opposition box from some of the main European nations, listed in order of the most-harshly treated per country. Germany: Leroy Sané, Ilkay Gundogan, Mesut Ozil, Shkodran Mustafi, Antonio Rudiger. Holland: Georginio Wijnaldum, Patrick van Aanholt, Virgil van Dijk, Anwar El Ghazi. Belgium: Eden Hazard, Christian Benteke, Romelu Lukaku. France: Alexandre Lacazette, Abdoulaye Doucoure, Olivier Giroud, N’Golo Kante, Lys Mousset.)

Dangerousness!

So, are English players just generally more dangerous than Brazilians or Africans? It seems unlikely, given that only the exceptional foreign players (full internationals, especially those from outside the EU prior to 2021, who get special exceptional-talent-based visas) could join our league, but any number of mediocre English players can – and do – ply their trade here. 

With this in mind, I worked with Andrew Beasley, again using the data from https://fbref.com/en/, to go beyond what I will call “standard” PBT (the gross number of touches), to delve into “dangerousness”. As detailed in more length for TTT subscribers last week, we selected six metrics to try and hone the PBT data into something that distinguished penalty-box loiterers with genuinely dangerous players. The six metrics we chose were as follows:

– Carries Into The Penalty Area (Per 90) 

– Successful Dribbles (Per 90)

– Penalty Box Touches (Per 90)

– Progressive Passes Received (Per 90)

– Average Shot Distance

– Non-Penalty xG Per Shot (average)

We then applied them to a group of 53 players, who comprised the 20 who won the most penalties, the 25 who had the greatest shortfall in number of penalties (absent penalties) and the 25 who had the most “unexpected” penalties (i.e. more than their expected totals). As you can see, this meant a number of players appeared in two of the three datasets (for example, Mo Salah wins a high number of penalties, but also, has a high number of absent penalties), which took it from 70 down to 53.

We ranked all the players on these six metrics, and anyone who had the top score was assigned 1.0, and anyone who had only half the number in that metric would be 0.50, and so on; and these were averaged out over four seasons. A maximum score across all six metrics would be 6.0, but no one average above 5.0, which would surely be Messi-esque. 

Do the six metrics capture everything? No. But they cover dribbling success rate and carrying the ball into the box; touching the ball in the box (can you not win penalties just by controlling the ball with your back to goal, or receiving a pass?) and in dangerous positions; and the closeness to goal for their shots and the clear-cut chances are covered by that and also xG. 

The top player for dangerousness? Raheem Sterling, who is also the top penalty winner. (That said, as explained last week, the top individual score in any season was Sadio Mané’s for 2020/21 so far, at 4.85.) Sterling averages 4.55.

Overall, Sadio Mané ranked 3rd (his last three seasons have seen a big incremental jump in dangerousness), Mo Salah 5th, Diogo Jota 11th and Roberto Firmino 12th. Only two of the top 14 were English. 

Logically, all of these players should have vaguely similar penalty awards based on their minutes played and their involvement in the box. But it varies greatly. Sterling has 13, Gabriel Jesus none; Zaha has 10, Firmino one.

We found that, on average, the group of 20 players who had won the most penalties were very dangerous indeed; but not quite as dangerous as the 25 players who seemed strangely harshly treated when looking purely at the number (and not the specifics) of their penalty-box touches – including the Brazilians and the Africans. 

Add the specifics of their PBTs – the dangerousness – and they become even more harshly treated. They are almost exclusively foreign players, too. Only 12% are English, compared to the 55% for those who win the most penalties, and 30% of the group that win the greatest number beyond what is expected.

By contrast, that most strangely favoured group – 30% English – were by far the least dangerous when looking at their general stats, too. On average, non-dangerous English players win far more penalties than dangerous foreign players. 

Only three of the most-dangerous 19 players were English (and four of the top-ranked 22), although this was a group of 53 selected for the aforementioned criteria (most penalties won, and a big positive or negative swing in the number of expected penalties based on standard penalty-box touches), and does not include players like Jack Grealish, Phil Foden and Michail Antonio, whose 2020/21 averages would put them into the top 20 (but equally, so would those of some overseas players not included; and the pre-2020/21 averages of Grealish, Foden, et al, would take them out of the top 20). 

Of course, Grealish and Antonio have won penalties (plural) in the four seasons covered. Harry Kane rates very low on dangerousness, which was a bit of a surprise – but he does seem to play deeper these days, and he was in the box a lot more prior to the start of 2019/20 according to his dangerousness score.

Some of the 53 players are midfielders, and it’s hard to know why, given that they make far fewer entries into the penalty box, they can lead to winning a greater number of penalties than more talented strikers who spend more time in the box, and also make more entries into the box.

Overall, the main difference seemed to be whether or not they were English, and not their “dangerousness”.

As “CVT” put it based on standard penalty box touches: “Another simple way to say it is ‘if the Premier League players were given penalties at the same rate as the English Ten (Sterling, Zaha, Murray, Lingard, et al), then foreign players would get 177% more penalties’.”

Some of the English players play for more counterattacking sides, but a penalty should be a penalty whether it’s in a crowded area or on the break, if it’s a foul. 

The latter may be easier to spot, with less going on, but it’s not like Sterling and Marcus Rashford haven’t won penalties on the break, or that players like Firmino, Jesus, Mané, Salah and Eden Hazard never counterattacked. So I’m not sure that argument stacks up.

If, visually, it looks more like a penalty on a counterattack than in a crowded area (where the ref’s view may be more likely to be obscured), then it’s up to VAR to correct for that. Equally, a counterattack will more often mean a referee is far further away from the action, and so is guessing a lot more – and hence, the bias comes into play. Again, VAR should correct for that. 

Indeed, I’m not convinced referees can tell even 30% of the time if something was a foul, given the speed and the angles, and hence why I was in favour of VAR; but VAR has been used to back up bad decisions, and the same biases apply as they are the same group of referees operating the technology at Stockley Park. (Even Michael Oliver – generally the best ref – said that none of the Liverpool players appealed for the red card after Jordan Pickford’s foul on Virgil van Dijk, and now whenever I watch games I try to see which team appeals first and hardest for decisions, and how it seems to lead to them getting a lot of incorrect decisions. Much of a fast-flowing game of football is an optical illusion, depending on the angle viewed from.)

Equally, Manchester United seem to be favoured at both ends, but having an English centre-back (just one penalty conceded in four seasons, despite several good shouts against him), and several attacking English players, it could be more to do with that pro-English bias than anything more pro-United from referees (although the North-west refs do give United a lot more than they give Liverpool, and as reasonably generous as Mancunian Anthony Taylor is to Liverpool, he’s far more generous to United; while Mike Dean, by contrast, is also more generous to United than to Liverpool – who are the team he punishes the most, albeit from a smaller sample size).

So, do English players “dive” or fall differently? My sense is that players like Harry Kane have mastered the plank-like flop (see the image to last week’s piece), where there’s such an attempt to not arch the back it leads to falling like a tree, in an equally unnatural way. In fairness, Luis Suarez was terrible for arching the back (and for pretend rolling around in agony, which was embarrassing), which was highlighted in England 10-20 years ago as a sign of cheating; but a lot of foreign players don’t get penalties for fouls, no matter how they crumble or how they try to stay on their feet. The data backs that up.

This has been on my mind for decades. One of my first games as a semi-pro as a striker in the 1990s was an FA Cup qualifying round, and as a 5’10” forward with pace (but 11 stone) I found myself constantly having my shirt and shorts pulled by a 6’3” 15-stone 1980s-era Steve Foster lookalike, whenever I got in behind him. I’ve described it before as like trying to drag a tractor. He would slow me down, then, when my legs ran out of power from trying to shake loose of this great lummox, take the ball from me. I got nothing from the ref, and it happened all game. These days, in the same situations, strikers correctly stop, or “fall”, to draw attention to the foul; Adam Lallana did this against Everton in the cup a couple of years back, to win a penalty. 

This is legitimate, and a world away from there being no contact and a pre-planned intent to dive. Even a hand on the shoulder can take away your split-second advantage, if you are a fast player; and a hand on the shoulder, just like two hands in the back or having hold of the shirt or the shorts, has never been legal in football. Shoulder to shoulder contact is allowed, but you cannot pull at an opponent. 

In three recent games, Sadio Mané has been praised – but also called naive – for not going down when fouled in the box. But if he ever does go down, he usually gets nothing, and is accused of going down too easily. Indeed, the worst thing that most TV commentators say about their fellow Englishmen is that they went down a bit easily, even if it was a blatant dive. They are called “clever” or “cute”, while the foreigners are frequently labelled as “cheats”. Mané and Salah are frequently accused of diving, even when fouled. 

Defending

It also works against foreign players at the other end. Fifteen non-English outfield players have conceded three or more Premier League penalties since the start of 2017/18, but just five England players have; and just two England internationals (Eric Dier and Kyle Walker). 

While there have been more foreign players than English players in the league in that time, English players, if playing c.33% of the minutes, are likely to win 45% of the penalties, while foreign players, playing c.55% of the minutes (the rest being Scots, Welsh, etc.) are likely to win just 45% of the penalties, yet concede up to 70%. (Note: I calculated this data at a different time to the other data quoted, and this was using penalty data from www.transfermarkt.com and WhoScored for Opta data on minutes played and nationalities, with all English-raised players counted as English if they played for England youth teams, even if they later switched allegiances.)

England internationals seem greatly favoured by referees, too. While they are clearly better players than English non-internationals, they concede far fewer penalties than expected and win even more penalties than expected, when compared against often better foreign players (as well as the inferior uncapped English ones, which admittedly makes sense). Again, this needs to be investigated. No one has a right to an identical number of penalties, but big disparities in how referees treat players is a serious problem for the integrity of the league, even if these refs are not consciously penalising “foreigners”. (Their perception of who “dives” is also likely to be influenced by the narrative, awash in football during my formative years, that ‘only foreigners dive’.)

All foreign players – elite internationals in many cases – win and concede penalties at a similar rate to mere journeyman English players; indeed, overseas players concede 11.9 penalties per 1,000 games (so over a very long career, each could expect to concede almost 12), whereas for England internationals it’s 8.9 and for English non-capped players it’s 11.1. The likes of Virgil van Dijk (three penalties conceded in the past four years) are more punished than the likes of Craig Dawson (one conceded, in 6,000+ minutes, or roughly two-thirds of the playing time of the Dutchman).

England internationals also would win 19.8 penalties in a career of 1,000 games, but foreign ones in the Premier League would win 8.9 per 1,000 games, and uncapped English players 6.5.  

The End is Nigh

There’s lot more to explore and reveal from the data, but I’ll go away and think about how best to share it. For now, I’ll share this article, and then go and do more work refining the data – but after a sufficient break to clear my head and breathe some fresh air.

But I’ll leave you with this quick snippet:

Combined Premier League penalties won by the following, 2017 onwards: Andrew Robertson, Georginio Wijnaldum, Trent Alexander-Arnold, Virgil van Dijk, James Milner, Xherdan Shaqiri, Jordan Henderson, Naby Keita, Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, Joel Matip, Diogo Jota, Philippe Coutinho, Daniel Sturridge, Curtis Jones, Joe Gomez and Thiago Alcantara.

ZERO. 

(Jota includes two seasons for Wolves)

From a total of 1,692 touches in the opposition penalty area.

… Glenn Murray. 210 touches in opposition area, four penalties!

… Jesse Lingard. 229 touches in opposition area, six penalties!