Thursday, October 20, 2011

鄭丁賢‧換作是我,打死不跑


“換作是你,你也會跑!”
中國佛山撞倒女童的貨車司機,露面時,當眾說了這句話。
王八(不是爆粗;王八是鱉類,泛指冷血動物),這是甚麼話?換作是我,我當然不會跑;如果我跑了,我還是人嗎?
換作是你,也不會跑,更不應該跑,因為我們都是人,不是王八。
錄影畫面中,全世界人類看到貨車前輪輾過女童王悅。司機稍停下來,應該是知道撞倒人了,然而,他不但沒下車救人,還干脆踩油,讓後輪再輾過女童。
前輪輾過,還有救治的機會,後輪再輾,已是奄奄一息。
司機就這樣跑了!然後,他還大言不慚的把其他人和他歸於一類,以為大家都會和他一樣跑了。
我們不會跑。我們會馬上停車,下車察看女童,叫救傷車,或是趕緊把女童送進醫院。
我們不會計算,撞死人是賠一兩萬元,撞傷人可能要賠幾十萬元。
這不是在市場做買賣,而是關係到一個生命;只要有人性,不會要奪走別人的生命。
因為我們是人類,我們的血是熱的,不是冷的。這還未到達道德層次,無須辯論道德。
這只是最基本的人性,最平凡的良心問題。
因為人性,我們會害怕,內疚,自責;而不是把後輪再輾過去。
因為良心,我們會彌補,救人,負責;而不是逃之夭夭,一走了之。
而後面路過的18個人,見死不救,而且還振振有詞;有的說沒看到血,所以不救;也有人說,看到了血,不敢救。
都是王八,因為他們同樣是冷血類。
換作是你或我,能夠袖手旁觀,見死不救嗎?
我想到我的小外甥女。唸小學時,她看到一隻小貓被車撞了,倒在路中央,一隻母貓在旁邊喵喵哀叫,不捨得離開。
路上車如流水,隨時會再輾過小貓,也會撞到母貓。
小外甥女二話不說,直衝路上,把大人嚇著了。
只見她撿起小貓,移到路旁。見它已無氣息,跑回家裡,找來鞋盒,裝入小貓,再挖個洞埋葬。
母貓在一旁看著整個過程,直到小貓入土,才默默離開。
那只是一隻貓,她沒有袖手旁觀,換作是人,我們能夠冷漠不顧嗎?
而這18個路人,不會那麼巧合,都是全中國最冷血的路人,剛好都在這裡路過吧!
在概率學來說,他們代表一般人,而第19個出現的拾荒阿婆救人,那才是異數。
這是社會現象,不是個別案例;這是群體冷酷,不只是個體冷血。如此社會,讓人不寒而慄。
換作是我,打死不跑。這個“我”,不只是個人的我,也是社會整體的大我。
人性從我不跑昇華,文明從我不跑誕生。(星洲日報/馬荷加尼‧作者:鄭丁賢‧《星洲日報》副總編輯)

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Rafa Sets the Record Straight


It was strange travelling up to Liverpool with the same two mates who accompanied me to many a game at Anfield (starting in our dim, distant pasts, when we were all childless and carefree and almost full of hair), only this time without a fixture taking place. (The last time we made the same journey without a game taking place was when we got to Liverpool, only to find the streets strangely deserted when walking up to Walton Breck Road; having not heard that the match had been cancelled due to Princess Diana being killed the night before).
My original aim was to spend this weekend on Merseyside, and take in the United game, followed by Rafa’s talk at the Empire on the Sunday evening. But my dad’s declining health meant that I didn’t want to be away from the hospice for more than 24 hours. Having already bought my own ticket when the ‘evening with Rafa’ was announced, the man himself later sent me two VIP passes, and it was hard to miss out on a unique night.
As I was obviously a big supporter of Rafa, many like-minded people gravitated to my work, and he still remains very popular on this site. (Just because we’ve moved on in terms of being fully behind Kenny, it doesn’t mean we have to ignore the recent past. Most intelligent fans could see through the bullshit written about Rafa, after all. Some have tried to do something similar with Kenny, and we won’t tolerate that, either. If you must criticise, stick to the facts.)
As such, quite a few of this site’s subscribers (and writers) were present, so it was nice to briefly meet most of them shortly before the event commenced. Of these, a few also had VIP tickets, which involved the chance to say hello to Rafa after the show, and get a picture taken. The only problem here was that it was past midnight, and the queues were still snaking around the corner.
The event itself was informative and entertaining, with masses of love in the room for the man on the stage. A largely scouse crowd gave Rafa a five-minute ovation when he took to the stage, and applause and laughter regularly broke out as he shared myriad anecdotes with the host, Steve Hothersall.
Rafa took the crowd on a journey from his difficult early days as a very young manager in Spain, before touching upon his first success, in getting Tenerife – with a certain Luis Garcia on loan from Barcelona – promoted to the top flight.
Then came the incredible achievements between 2001 and 2009 at Valencia and Liverpool respectively (two La Liga titles; one Uefa Cup; one FA Cup; two Champions League finals, with one obviously won, and a further semi-final; plus the highest-ever points tally – 86 – for the runners-up in the English top division).
And finally, onto the period when things didn’t go as planned, and his thoughts on why things didn’t work out.
He spoke on a couple of occasions about how well Kenny Dalglish was doing, and how the new owners seemed to be saying and doing the right things, and also included the ‘Director of Football’ (Damien Comolli) in his praise. He said that the club ‘felt right’ again, after the madness of Hicks, Gillett and Purslow. He also thanked SoS for helping rid the club of that particular pair of Americans.
Rafa’s ambition remains to return to the job at some point, but long into the future, after “Kenny has won lots of trophies and retired”. In a quiet moment, a big booming scouse voice bellowed out from the stalls, “I miss you Rafa!”, to much laughter and applause. If Kenny can return after 20 years, why can’t he?
There were tactical chalkboards, taking the audience through the changes at half-time in Istanbul (including “Djimi, go take a shower”!), with video evidence of how these alterations proved successful. He acknowledged that the Reds were also lucky, but later spoke of his frustration of 2007, when, unlike in 2005, his side deserved to win. (Funny how none of his critics, who said that he was lucky in 2005, neglect to mention that, overall, the Reds deserved to win one of the finals, and AC Milan the other. It says a lot about football that it just happened to be the ones the clubs didn’t win.)
There were charts on how successful zonal marking actually was – a case of looking at the stats, rather than taking the Andy Gray approach of overreacting to the occasional goal conceded this way, as if it was the norm, and ignoring the 100 corners which were successfully defended. (And similarly, the likes of Gray could see three man-marking goals conceded in a single game and never once say “that’s the fault of man-marking”; only the players got the blame for those errors, never the system or the manager.)
In the second half, I’m proud to say that this site’s Andrew Beasley got an unexpected mention, on account of his stats – which I circulated on Twitter some time back – about how Liverpool actually had a better points per game rate after the supposed ‘Rafa rant’ (puke) than before it. So much for that costing the Reds the title, then. Indeed, it wasn’t long after the rant that the Reds went on an incredible winning run, in what was the best few months of Rafa’s reign; four put past each of Arsenal, Chelsea, Real Madrid and Manchester United, and five past Aston Villa.
I also got a mention, halfway through the first half, in relation to the figures I produced for this site (and in Pay As You Play) on Rafa’s spending, looking purely at the players he bought and sold.
As such, I thought I’d better take a bit of time to explain what he was referring to.
While a manager’s net spend is more revealing than his gross spend – after all, if you have to sell a good player to buy another good player, you still have only one good player, despite two transactions – it’s perhaps more revealing to look only at his own purchases (and their later sell-on fees). After all, net spend often includes the unfair task of selling a predecessor’s duds.
My argument has always been that Rafa inherited a fairly strong spine (lacking a centre-forward, mind) from Gérard Houllier seven years ago, but that by the time Rafa took over, Hyypia and Hamann – two bedrocks – were in their 30s. Henchoz was also 30 (as were several squad players, including Smicer), and given that funds were tight under David Moores in comparison with the new, richer owners around the league, it didn’t leave much chance to sell Houllier’s players to raise cash in order to improve the squad.
Hyypia and Hamann were rightly kept on for a few more successful seasons, until they left on free transfers, having served with distinction. Other ageing players left quickly, often for nothing.
Then there was Harry Kewell, easily one of the club’s most talented players, but never fit, and therefore not a saleable or reliable asset; and there was also Markus Babbel, whose terrible two-year illness robbed the Reds of a great right-back, as well as a sell-on fee. Two horrific compound fractures reduced Houllier’s Djibril Cissé from a £14.2m club-record signing (roughly £30m in today’s money) to a mediocre asset at best, even if he was hardly the composed striker the Reds were crying out for. Hardly the story of a lucky manager, inheriting that lot.
Given that Houllier’s best buys tended to be older players – incredibly, in six years, the only really successful, value-for-money signing who was under 25 was Riise (and even he was very good, rather than amazing) – it meant that most were past their sell-by date (in terms of a fee to reinvest).
This meant that the younger ones who were still around in 2004, including Diouf, Diao, Traore, Cheyrou, Vignal, Biscan, Le Tallec, Sinama Pongolle, Kirkland and Baros would be sold for less than £18m combined; or just £1.8m each for those 10 players, who had cost more than twice as much just a few years earlier.
Aside from selling Steven Gerrard, who was home-grown and being courted by Chelsea, who else in the 2004 squad left to Rafa would have generated an above average fee at that time? Michael Owen, the other major asset, left on a reduced pre-Bosman fee of just £8m (£6.2m less than the Reds had committed to pay for the inferior Cissé) … but who was worth more than £8m, at a time when both Chelsea and Manchester United were paying £24m+ on several occasions?
The point Rafa was trying to make related to how much his own signings had, on average, increased in value.
Since being sacked, several more of his signings have been sold; this does not go towards Rafa’s ‘net spend’ figure, which by conventional measures ends the moment a manager is no longer in the job – but it does show how shrewdly he invested overall.
Like any managers he had his fair share of flops, but rarely did he lose too much money on a player (just £3m was lost on the quickly-offloaded Robbie Keane, for example, who failed to gel with Torres; meaning that the one and only exception will be Aquilani, even if he is now playing on loan for the Italian champions. Aquilani may end up being the only player that Rafa loses more than £7m on. Glen Johnson is the next-likeliest, but has been successful when fit, and only recently turned 27.)
By contrast, big profits were made on Xabi Alonso and, seven months after the manager had cleared his desk, Fernando Torres. Javier Mascherano was fairly expensive to start with, but held his value and moved to the best club team in the world.
A profit was made on Yossi Benayoun, even though he was 27 when bought and 30 when sold. Pepe Reina was the subject of a £20m bid from Arsenal last summer, but thankfully he is still a Red. Lucas Leiva, Martin Skrtel and Daniel Agger have all proved quality additions, with two of the three (Agger and Lucas) in the best current XI, and still only in their mid-20s.
Of Rafa’s best buys, only Kuyt is now too old to recoup a major fee, although like Hyypia and Hamann, he’s been worth keeping into his 30s. Interestingly, Rafa noted that in 2006 he had the choice between Kuyt (£9m) and Daniel Alves (c.£13m), and at the time saw the need for a striker as greatest; but even though both players were relatively cheap considering their quality, Liverpool, without the riches of Chelsea and Man United, couldn’t afford both. It was a case of constantly compromising, whilst being expected by unrealistic critics to win the title.
Profits were also made on Arbeloa, Ngog, Ayala, Insua, Crouch, Sissoko, Mavinga and Bellamy, as well as Leto, who failed to get a work permit. A profit was also made on the underrated (if admittedly unspectacular, and decidedly moody) Voronin, although it’s fairly easy to make a couple of million on a free transfer.
Based purely on the time since Rafa left the club, and therefore excluding those already earmarked for an exit while he was still in charge, an incredible £90m+ has been raised by the sale of a handful of his purchases (for which, roughly £55m was originally spent).
Of Rafa’s signings (and in total contrast to those of Roy Hodgson), quite a few still remain, even after two big overhauls seen since the summer of 2010, which has seen 15 new players arrive.
Still present are Reina, Johnson, Agger, Kuyt, Lucas, Skrtel, Maxi, Shelvey, the young Hungarian goalkeeper Gulacsi, plus teenagers like Sterling, Wisdom and Suso, who surely have very bright futures in the game.
At least five of those are still first XI players, and the total fees paid for the lot (excluding the youngsters) is more-or-less £50m; or exactly what Liverpool received for Fernando Torres in January. And if they were all sold today, they’d fetch around £70m. (More, if Agger could stay fit.)
While Hodgson had to operate on a tight budget, his seven signings still lost the club money, and in an incredibly short space of time at that. His one success – Meireles – was sold for just a fraction more than what was paid. Joe Cole is out on loan, as any transfer value dwindles due to age (even though he’s doing well in France, albeit with Liverpool subsidising his wages), while fellow free transfer Fabio Aurelio’s worsening injuries have shown why he wasn’t offered a new contract by Rafa, despite the player’s undoubted talent and the manager’s clear fondness for him. Brad Jones represents £2.3m that won’t be recouped. Danny Wilson is young, and has time to prove himself, but is not really progressing thus far. And the dreaded pair of Poulsen and Konchesky cost almost £10m combined, and left for about a third of that amount.
With a profit of just half a million pounds made on Meireles, the rest represent a loss of at least ten times that amount.
Looking back to 2004, Rafa had a fairly similar amount to spend, but as well as two very cheap flops who were later sold for what they cost (Josemi and Nunez), he bought Luis Garcia and Xabi Alonso. So while Hodgson’s purchases added nothing new or special to the side he inherited – and therefore contributed to his own struggles – Rafa brought in two game-changers, who scored and created plenty of goals, and helped the Reds win trophies.
(This is not designed to denigrate Hodgson, merely to show the comparison between a manager who succeeded in many areas but was lambasted by the press, with one who, despite difficult circumstances, failed to get things right from the start, and was excused for those failings. Ultimately, even in Rafa’s one bad season, the team won a greater percentage of games, scored a lot more goals and had a far better goal difference than we saw in those mad six months last season. And while Rafa noted that Hodgson claimed he had to put up with Gillett and Hicks for three months – fair point – Rafa had to put up with them for threeyears.)
So anyway, all of that might better explain the subject Rafa briefly touched upon, but the nuances of which might have been beyond someone speaking in his second language, to a crowded auditorium.
After the show I stopped by to say hello, and the first thing he did was ask how my dad was doing. When we got onto football, he tried to explain what he was getting at when discussing my figures, and therefore maybe the previous few paragraphs will help clarify his point for anyone who was there!
You may have read other reviews of the event by now, so I won’t go into any more detail. Suffice it to say that the evening was a big success, judging by the reaction of the audience and the fact that the venue was absolutely heaving.
Hopefully Rafa will find a job where the club is looking to buy players rather than offload them (Liverpool under Gillett and Hicks, and Inter Milan, who became a selling club as soon as Mourinho, who’d spent heavily to bring massive success, moved on; Jose providing the boom, Rafa inheriting the bust. Still, he did add the World Club Championship and Italian Super Cup during a brief stay, and had taken them into the knockout stage of the Champions League with a creaking team averaging over 30 years old.)
For me, Rafa remains an important part of Liverpool’s past, and yet for all that I celebrate (and proudly defend) that, I don’t go around trying to imagine him as part of the club’s future. If he returns at some stage, of course I’d welcome it (if the circumstances were right), but I’m concentrating on backing the current regime to succeed. As, indeed, he is.
That said, in some ways Rafa remains current. As mentioned, a fair few of his players remain in the side – and so every week we discuss them – and hardly a week goes by when he isn’t unfairly sniped at in the papers. He’ll move on to other jobs, but his wife Montse’s Foundation – for whom the event was organised – will continue to raise funds for the charities of Liverpool. And that, like so many things with the Benítezes, is to be applauded.
Bald, ‘starry-eyed blogger’ with ‘fat Spanish waiter’ (© people who don’t like us)

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

鄭丁賢‧懶人國


http://opinions.sinchew-i.com/node/21067

2011-09-28 09:20
希臘今天對世界的衝擊,宛如二千多年前,亞歷山大大帝要征服地球的威脅。
當年,亞歷山大率領希臘精英,不分晝夜,不眠不休的千里狂征;聞到希臘人的馬蹄聲,盡是風聲鶴唳。
如今,希臘人以自我摧毀的姿態,要挾世界金融體系,搞到各國股市東歪西倒,吹響全球經濟衰退的號角,世人感受到希臘吹來的冷風嗖嗖。
當年,希臘軍隊的足跡,止於印度;如今,希臘債務的效應,席捲全球。
正當各國政經領袖為希臘困境苦尋對策,而全球企業和投資者都因希臘問題而備受壓力時,希臘人民的應對方式,卻是大搞希臘式的街頭派對。
希臘的交通工友,公務員,教師等,一齊走上街頭,進行大規模罷工;當然,這已經是尋常現象,而且,一系列示威罷工的日期,已經安排到下個月。
示威和罷工的目的,在於抗議政府削減工資和退休金,減少福利和津貼,以及準備加稅。
希臘政府的這些措施,是要滿足國際貨幣基金組織,以及各債權國的要求;它們的出發點很簡單,希臘必須先自救,才能獲得國際救助。
希臘加入歐元區之後,經濟上是二流國家,但是,政府闊氣十足,人民要足發達國家的福利和享受。
大家都要過舒服的好日子,政府就發行債務借錢應付,讓人民有一流生活,政府就可以繼續執政。
於是,政府聘請大量公務員,每10名就業人口,其中就有一人是拿公糧,享有琳琅滿目的福利。
工作輕鬆之外,40幾歲就可以領退休金“養老”;不幸掛了,子女還可以續領年金。
私人界的情況也不錯,政府照樣補貼醫療、教育和吃住,而且不必為稅務煩惱,可以儘量逃稅;希臘的地下經濟龐大,可以通過賄賂、獻金等解決問題。
10幾年下來,希臘變成一個懶人國;民間缺乏生產力,政府沒有管理能力,國家少了競爭力。
當債務堆積如奧林匹斯山,開始崩塌時,繁華化為泡影,人民卻還沉醉。
大家寧可走上街頭抗議,也不願意清醒過簡樸生活。他們以為,捉緊歐盟老大德國,要挾全球經濟,就可以繼續過好日子。
但是,全球對希臘已經很厭煩,一些經濟學家,如紐約大學的魯比尼,認為應把希臘逐出歐元區,更有人主張讓希臘破產,徹底破壞之後,才有重生的可能。
懶人畢竟要承受後果;而世界上的懶人國,也不只希臘一個。(星洲日報/馬荷加尼‧作者:鄭丁賢‧《星洲日報》副總編輯)

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

不准“Undilah”,怎么民主化?


http://lengkekmun.blogspot.com/2011/09/undilah.html

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2011



最近阅读新闻,常常怀疑到底是我自己精神分裂,还是记者精神分裂,抑或是政治领袖精神分裂?

前几天才读到首相矢言政府要把马来西亚打造成“世界上最民主的国家”,相继就发生NTV7描述东马贫困现况的《我要上学》记录片被腰斩、以及由大马音乐人张子夫制作的Undilah(投票吧)”短片被禁止在电视台播放

我上网观赏了“Undilah”短片。如果是专为反对党宣传的作品,被禁止登上电视荧幕早已是我国政府的标准作业程序之一。问题是,短片由头到尾都没有呼吁观众支持哪一个阵营,而只是鼓励大家登记成为选民,并投下手中一票,以决定国家的未来。

这个讯息,有什么问题?

根据报道,大马多媒体与通讯委员会指示寰宇电视和首要媒体集团不准播放这个短片的原因是,巫统话望生国会议员东姑拉沙里在片中指称,大马目前面对很多问题,人们应该以投票来解决这些问题

这个讯息,又有什么问题?

政府是不是认为马来西亚目前没有面对任何问题、举国河清海晏、人人幸福美满,所以任何指称国家面对很多问题的言论,都是谎言,所以不准在电视上播放?

还是政府认为,呼吁人民以投票来解决问题是大逆不道的谋反作乱,所以不能让短片登堂入室?

由上述两道问题所衍生的另外两道问题是,第一,政府难道认定自己是这个国家问题丛生的罪魁祸首?第二,人民如果都以投票来解决问题,被“解决”的一定是政府吗?

如果答案都是否定的话,那为何政府还要禁播“Undilah”

当然,我们的政府向来行事果断,不是所有事情都要向人民交代、解答的。问题是,通常奉行真正民主原则的政府都不会这样。

在高谈什么十万八千里外的“世界上最民主国家”美梦之前,不如先上一堂民主精神的基本课,学习一下开阔自己的心胸,别动不动就搬出一个“”字。我们不奢求成为世界上最民主,以目前的情况来看,只要可以达到民主的合格水平,就值得谢天谢地了。

我是谁?

My Photo
全职良好市民,兼职市场经理,业余专栏作者。

Thursday, September 22, 2011

应该感谢709大集会!


http://lengkekmun.blogspot.com/2011/09/709_19.html



净选盟709大集会落幕两个多月后的今天,目睹一系列后续发展,经过两个月的沉淀反思,你会对它作出怎么样的评价?反对、谴责;还是赞成、感谢?

先来更新一下记忆:

大集会前,马华公会呼吁群众:“以大集会方式抗议,会导致我国陷入动荡,从而影响国家经济。国人应该反对且拒绝参与这集会,千万不要给有心人利用。”除了促请党员不要参与集会,甚至有人建议对参与集会的党员采取纪律行动。

巫统领袖,从首相、副首相到各部长则众口一词:“有人想通过这项集会颠覆社会安全,以夺取国家政权。 ”除了国阵领袖,警方更是从不间断地以逮捕手段来警告群众切勿参与这项集会。

认定709大集会是邪恶大联盟的不明事理者,恐怕不在少数。

两个多月后,首相纳吉民调支持率下降,首相署部长许子根解释:“这是因为警方应对709大集会的手法,引起民众反感。”随后,首相宣布废除内安法令,内政部长希山慕丁解画:“我们花了2年才走到这儿。国内外示威、辩论及净选盟709游行等,促成了首相今晚的宣布。”

咦,净选盟709大集会不是会造成国家陷入动荡的吗?如果是这样的话,应对大集会不是应该打压得越用力、人民就越支持的吗?怎么原来打压709大集会反而引起民众反感、甚至导致首相民调下降?怎么709大集会反而会促成首相宣布废除政府沿用了数十年的恶法?

如此一来,我们应该感谢、还是谴责709大集会?

身为民主社会的一份子,如果你还相信人民才是真正当家作主的,那你就必须先了解一个永恒的事实:执政者不会主动向民意低头,除非他感受到民意的压力。

你要执政者听到你的声音,先确保你的声音够响;你要执政者看到你的立场,先确保你的动作够大

709之后,政府首次正视净选盟的诉求、总算同意来届大选使用不褪色墨汁、终于宣布废除内安法令。。。怎么样,你是不是应该感谢在709为你走上街头去嗅催泪弹捱化学水泡的那5万人?

Sunday, September 18, 2011

看到两线竞争的好处了吗?

http://lengkekmun.blogspot.com/2011/09/blog-post_1037.html

SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2011


首相纳吉在大马日前夕宣布,政府将废除一系列钳制人权的恶法,包括恶名昭彰的《内安法令》。

这项宣布,只要是脑筋正常的国民,都不会反对。然而,你越是赞同这项宣布,就越是应该在被一些国阵成员党急着献出的鲜花和掌声迷惑之前,梳理出为何政府会做出这个决定的理由?同样的理由,将是为你我开启更多公民权利的钥匙。

当然,民联领袖会落力宣传,这是反对党及民间团体多年来对政府施压的成果。同时间,国阵成员党会极力辩称,这项决定无关选举、无关政治,更无关反对党施压,纯粹是因为现任首相开明理智。

到底谁对谁错?民众无须过于陷入朝野的口水战,而是应该运用本身独立的思考进行分析。

民众首先必须了解民主体制内权力游戏的逻辑。民主体制建立的前提在于对人性的不信任。也正因为不相信政客中会有天使,更不相信掌握权力者会在无须顾虑失去权力的情况下自动自发推动利民政策,尤其是必须以削弱当权者权力为代价的利民政策,所以我们才需要朝野轮替执政的两线制。

不需要把政客摆上神台,他们和你我一样,都是凡夫俗子,自然也超脱不了凡夫俗子的局限。

民联提出“橙皮书”联合政纲和“百日新政”惠民政策,当然是为了赢取民心,赢得选票,进而赢下政权。政党若不想赢得政权,倒不如转型为非政府组织?

同样的,国阵愿意放下身段,俯顺民意废除恶法,当然也是为了留住民心,留下选票,进而留守政权。国阵若不是为了保住政权,难道是承认自己历届首相都是不解民心,只有现任一人懂得体恤民情?

朝野实力的拉近,才是人民真正当家作主的时刻。有望夺下政权的一方,会极力靠拢民意,提出民之所欲的政策;可能失去政权的一方,也会被逼重新正视民意,跟进政敌提出的利民政策。

虽然《内安法令》还未真正废除、虽然即将有两项替代的“新法令”让人民不能开心得太早,但是我们仍然应该为所有曾为促成两线制而付出过努力的民间组织、平民百姓给于一个鼓励的掌声。

掌声之后,再相互提醒,两线制现在仅是雏形,格局随时会打回原形。既然看到了前方的好,就不要再走回头路了。
 
稿投中国报《凌志纵文》

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

鄭丁賢‧馬來西亞交易


http://opinions.sinchew-i.com/node/20805

朋友剛從澳洲回來;他捎回來的消息是,澳洲正在掀起大馬熱。
不過,不算是好消息。
當地最熱門的話題,是澳洲和大馬交換難民計劃;澳洲人稱之為“馬來西亞交易”(Malaysian Deal)。
在這項交易下,澳洲和大馬將交換難民;大馬準備收容滯留在澳洲的800難民,澳洲則將審核接納滯留在大馬的4千難民。
洲總理吉拉德推動這項交換計劃,大馬也欣然接受。


計劃在大馬沒有成為課題(主要是人們摸不清楚究竟在搞甚麼),在澳洲卻是大件事。
澳洲人群起反對,根據一項調查,有78%人民反對這項交換。
報章上是一片撻伐,大城市如悉尼和墨爾本等,還有反對和抗議的布條。
吉拉德的出發點,是解決澳洲最棘手的海上難民問題,也要平息澳洲人對難民湧入的不滿。
幾年前,澳洲工黨上台之後,採取比較寬鬆和人道的難民政策,接納一些外國難民。
這項改變,吸引了很多伊拉克、伊朗、阿富汗、巴基斯坦等中亞國家的人民,前去澳洲。
他們不具備合格的難民身份,不能通過正常管道進入澳洲。既然不能從前門進去,就採取了偏激的走後門途徑。
他們乘坐船隻,來到澳洲水域,強行登陸,或是自行沉船,等待救援。澳洲海防隊不能見死不救,只好把他們帶上岸。
幾年來,240艘船隻達到目的,送進了至少1萬2千海上難民。
這種冒死和以死相逼的手法,澳洲政府束手無策,人民也氣得牙癢癢。
澳洲的人權法律,卻也阻止政府將這些海上難民遣送回原國;於是,一些人獲准居留,一些則被扣留。
在“大馬交易”計劃下,一些海上難民準備送到馬來西亞,交換在大馬滯留,申請第三國收容的合格難民。
吉拉德政府希望計劃一旦落實,可以阻嚇海上難民。嘿嘿,以後再自行沉船,就把你們送到馬來西亞,看你們怕未!
吉拉德以為澳洲人會感激她的做法,但是,計劃宣佈之後,引來相反的反應。
很多澳洲人擔心,這些海上難民被送到大馬,將會遭到“非人道對待”;澳洲的人權組織,更把大馬扣留營許多惡劣記錄公開,嚇壞了很多澳洲人。
民眾的心理,從排斥海上難民,轉為同情他們的遭遇,紛紛為他們請命,反對吉拉德把他們送到大馬。
這股反對浪潮成形,吉拉德的形象大跌,被視為一個“缺乏道德感”的總理。
人權組織還告到法院,控告吉拉德政府違反人權。
澳洲法院判決政府違法,無權把難民遣送到大馬。民間大為歡喜,吉拉德面對垮台。
這是澳洲人可愛之處。談到人權和人道,自己的問題都丟到腦後。
從另一個角度來看,這也看出澳洲人對大馬的印象,哀哉!(星洲日報/馬荷加尼‧作者:鄭丁賢‧《星洲日報》副總編輯)