Saturday, April 7, 2012

Serious? Malaysia standard of Education is Better than some advanced countries?

What a joke, this definitely one of the candidate of joke of the year in this Bolehland.........

Stay tune, more joke to come.....

____________________________________________________________

Malaysians fail to get into Harvard for second year running

http://blog.limkitsiang.com/2012/04/07/malaysians-fail-to-get-into-harvard-for-second-year-running/


by Lee Wei Lian
The Malaysian Insider
Apr 07, 2012
KUALA LUMPUR, April 7 — Malaysians failed to gain admission into the world’s most prestigious university for the second year in a row due to a slide in the quality of applicants, said Harvard University’s selection panel chief for Malaysia.
Not only did no Malaysian student receive an offer letter but none apparently was even good enough to make it to the interview rounds.
This comes after a controversy erupte over the quality of Malaysian education when Education Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin pointed to a World Economic Forum report to claim that Malaysians had a higher standard of education compared to that in some advanced countries.
Opposition lawmaker Tony Pua later rubbished Muhyiddin’s claims, pointing to another international study — the PISA 2009+ — that showed Malaysian students lagging far behind western nations in terms of literacy, mathematics and scientific understanding.
Datuk Dr Goh Cheng Teik, who leads the Harvard team that interviews prospective Malaysian students, said he was informed the quality of applicants had deteriorated.
“I called the Harvard College of Admissions Office and was told that although they received applications from Malaysian students, no one was shortlisted for interviews as they are not considered competitive enough,” he was quoted as saying by The Star.
A two-year absence from incoming Harvard freshman classes is enough to raise concerns over the quality trends of Malaysian education given that at least one Malaysian had been admitted to Harvard every year from 1985 to 2010.
A statement from Harvard’s interview panel showed that Malaysia was only fourth among Southeast Asian countries in terms of enrolment in the Ivy League institution.
Singapore has the highest number of Harvard undergraduates with 18, followed by Thailand with seven, Vietnam with six, Malaysia with five and Indonesia with two.
SMK Damansara Jaya alumnus Avinaash Subramaniam, who was awarded a full scholarship, was the last Malaysian accepted at Harvard in 2010.
Harvard was ranked the world’s best university for seven consecutive years by Times Higher Education (THE) until it was bumped into second place by the California Institute of Technology last year.
It was ranked the No. 1 university in the world last year by the Center for World-Class Universities of Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Some 34,950 applicants were received by Harvard for the 2016 graduating class and only 6.3 per cent were accepted.
According to the World Economic Forum’s global competitiveness report that was cited by Muhyiddin, Malaysia was ranked 14th among 142 countries and second in Asean for quality education.
Pua pointed out however that the WEF study was merely based on the opinions of 87 local businessmen who were asked to rate on a scale of one to seven how much they felt the country’s educational system has met the needs of a competitive economy.
He noted that the PISA report said that only “56 per cent of students are estimated to have a proficiency in reading literacy that is at or above the baseline level needed to participate actively and productively in life”.
For mathematics, the PISA study revealed that only 41 per cent of students are proficient in the subject at the baseline level. For science, 57 per cent made the baseline level.

笑话12.4.1



相对论
一群青年学生问爱因斯坦什么是相对论。
他打个比喻:如果你与一位美丽的姑娘坐谈两个小时,只感觉那只是一分钟。而你坐在火炉旁仅仅一分钟却觉得有两个小时的难受,这就是相对论。


流行
俄国文学批评家赫尔今对庸俗的音乐总是捂着耳朵拒听。
主人说:演奏的乐曲都是最流行和高尚的。
赫尔今:流行就高尚吗?
主人:不高尚会流行吗?
赫尔今:流行性感冒不算高尚吧?


帽子下的脑袋
安徒生衣着简便,生活俭朴。
一日外出,有人问他:你脑袋上的帽子是什么东西?能算是帽子吗?
安徒生答道:你帽子下的脑袋是什么东西?能算是脑袋吗?


慢性自杀
伏尔泰咖啡瘾头十分大。
有朋友劝告:这是慢性毒药,你这么喝,等於慢性自杀。
伏尔泰说:你说得真对,这真是慢性的,以致我活到今天,65岁还没有死。

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

林丹出没多少纪录已作古 伦敦奥运或成就空前王者


http://sports.sina.com.cn  2012年03月12日02:55  新浪体育微博
  新浪体育讯 对于拥有全满贯殊荣的林丹来说,已无需在运动场上再证明什么。不过,只要林丹亮相赛场,总会吸引众人的目光。牵动众人心弦的不仅仅是林李大战,还有林丹屡屡悄然间完成创造世界之最的壮举。
  五夺全英公开赛,使林丹成为近36年来全英赛男单赛场的多金王。在全英赛历史上,梁海量、柯普斯分别创造了8金、7金壮举,不过这两位巨星创造辉煌的上世纪六七十年代,有着“无冕之王”的国羽队没有参加全英赛,中国选手因政治原因多年无缘世界赛场。这一历史事实,使梁海量、柯普斯这些奖牌的含金量多少打了些折扣。而林丹的5枚金牌,均来自于世界列强云集的全英赛,将他称为世界之最并不为过。
  作为百年赛事,全英赛一直号称国际羽坛第一公开赛,在世锦赛诞生前还有非正式世锦赛的身份。2002年至2012年,林丹年年亮相全英赛,这期间除2003年首轮出局外,其他10届均打进8强,其中竟有9届打进半决赛,一共收获5金3银1铜。扫遍近36年全英赛,在竞争最激烈的男单赛场,拥有如此出色且稳定战绩的,惟林丹一人。
  世锦赛是影响力仅次于奥运会羽毛球赛的国际羽坛顶尖赛事,在这一世界大赛上,林丹同样是NO.1。2006年至2009年,林丹在世锦赛实现三连冠,去年世锦赛夺回冠军,四枚金牌的成绩同样创造了世界之最。林丹的金牌数比排在第2位的中国宿将杨阳竟然多出两枚。
  去年底,林丹在中国柳州参加了世界羽联超级赛总决赛,前几届林丹因种种原因均未亮相。首度亮相总决赛,林丹充分展示了超级丹风采,以五连冠战绩无可非议地摘走桂冠,从而将国内外所有重要赛事金牌揽于一身,这些赛事包括奥运会、世锦赛、全英赛、亚运会、亚锦赛、全运会单打冠军,苏迪曼杯、汤姆斯杯、亚运会团体赛冠军,成为世界羽坛独一无二的全满贯。请注意,这个独一无二,不仅仅是男单,还包括其他四个单项!
  在不少公开赛,林丹也创造了之最。和全英公开赛一样,超级丹在德国公开赛、中国公开赛均书写了五冠王神奇,均傲视群雄。中国大师赛迄今举行了七届,男单冠军竟有4次写在林丹名下。目前同样属于超级赛的丹麦公开赛,林丹也有3次问鼎纪录,力压盖德、陈宏等高手。
在林丹的心目中,书写传奇的下一个赛场应该是4个月后的伦敦奥运会。自从1992年跨进奥运会大家庭以来,男单项目先后产生了5枚金牌,林丹与魏仁芳、拉尔森、吉新鹏、陶菲克各夺一金。即将开赛的伦敦奥运会,给了林丹又一次创造历史的机会。虽然来自马来西亚的李宗伟实力不俗,虽然青年国手谌龙冲击力颇强,不过和林丹相比,他俩距离奥运金牌的距离似乎更远些。(王全立)

林丹:伤病不要影响李宗伟 伦敦奥运我们相约再战


新浪体育讯 北京时间3月12日凌晨,2012年全英羽球赛落下大幕,男单决赛中,因为李宗伟因伤退赛,林丹轻松获胜,摘得个人第5个全英赛男单冠军。夺冠后的林丹还是对老友李宗伟的伤情给予了关注,希望不要影响到他的奥运参赛。
  作为5个单项决赛的压轴大戏,现场有8000多名观众为这场世纪大战助阵。一位是卫冕冠军、世界排名第一的大马一哥;另一位是4夺全英赛冠军,当今世界唯一的全满贯得主。两人的决赛绝对是火星撞地球。
  不过本场比赛进行到第2局时,李宗伟的肩伤复发,无法继续比赛,不得不做出退赛选择,林丹也就此戏剧性的夺冠。而这也是林丹第5次获得全英赛男单冠军。
  赛后,林丹首先感谢了现场观众,感谢他们为自己加油助威。“我想感谢现场每一位观众,正是你们的加油才让我有了获胜的动力。”林丹说。
  对于李宗伟的伤势,林丹表示了关心,“我希望这个伤病不要影响他太多,因为我们还要在奥运会中相见呢。李宗伟还要代表马来西亚征战世界大赛。
  本赛季开始强势拿下韩国超级赛和大马超级赛冠军的李宗伟势头不错,希望能在全英赛中复仇去年世锦赛惜败林丹之仇。不过他在半决赛和韩国名将李炫一的比赛中,伤到了手臂,由此也留下了隐患。
  本场比赛开始后不久,李宗伟就多次出现肩部疼痛的情况,一度请队医给自己进行短暂的治疗。再坚持打完首局,第二局2-6落后林丹时,坚持不下去的李宗伟向裁判提出退赛申请,最终李宗伟和林丹握手致意,交换了球衣,比赛也就此结束。
  选择退赛的李宗伟赛后也向记者透露了实情,“我尝试坚持打完首局,不过之后越来越严重,我不得不停止。我很失望,但我不能冒险。我知道我不能完成比赛,所以我已经退出了下周开始的瑞士赛。”
  汤杯和奥运会已经越来越近,大马也需要一个健康的李宗伟来带队征战,因此大马一个需要更多的时间来恢复,养好伤病。
  和李宗伟的对决,林丹也是很珍惜,“这样的时刻对我们来说很重要,毕竟我们都已经到了职业生涯的末期,现在的比赛更多的已经是无关胜负。”林丹说

Monday, March 12, 2012

Paul Tomkins : Danger: Season Imploding Alert


Three league defeats on the spin makes for pretty grim reading – the worst run over a trio of league fixtures for a decade.
If Arsenal capitulated after last year’s Carling Cup defeat, then Liverpool are in danger of doing the same upon victory. Such success can breed confidence, and long-term, may yet do so – the experience of coming out on top in big games is valuable – but also, in the short term, engender a sense that normal league games are underwhelming.
The last vestiges of air in Liverpool’s league sails was lost against Arsenal – who, by last week, were resurgent – when the Reds were clearly the better team on the day. That left a ten point gap to 4th, and a sense that, in the league at least, there’s little left to play for. I’ve been witnessing these types of seasons for years; once the league position seems impossible to improve upon, and there’s no danger of relegation, it all goes a bit limp.
Spurs are currently doing the same, having also lost three on spin – in their case, for the first time under Harry Redknapp. From being ‘supposed’ title-challengers a few weeks ago, they’re now in danger of falling out of the top four, with Arsenal gaining in confidence and Chelsea likely to get a short-term burst from switching manager.
Had the Arsenal game last week ended in the victory the Reds’ play merited, our mood would be different now. Instead, we encountered a dire match on Wearside, played in howling winds and on a bumpy pitch, and were left with little to smile about. Even the winning goal was a cruel taunt, with Sunderland hitting the woodwork, only for it to bounce against Pepe Reina’s head, back against the post and roll kindly to Bendtner to score.
Before a big week of games you tend to witness a sub-par performance; in this case, one eye on Everton on Tuesday, and the chance of working towards more silverware next Sunday. It’s not necessarily conscious; more a case of the players knowing in the back of their minds that they want to be present, and full of energy, for those bigger occasions. So it becomes a little half-hearted.
And right now, Liverpool are not at the stage where they can go anywhere, at any time, and grind out results; especially not without key players like Agger, Gerrard, Johnson and Lucas in the XI. In 2004/05, Liverpool were similar; winning some massive games, but losing plenty of the easier ones (particularly on the road). Liverpool will play with much more intensity in the next two games, because that’s the way it tends to work.
While we may hark back to the good old days when referring to the credit that Kenny has in the bank with fans, it’s not just a case of remembering the John Barnes/Peter Beardsley vintage and finding faith. Liverpool played some very good football last season, and have on plenty of occasions this season.
Right now, this is indeed Hodgsonesque form – not good enough. But with a trophy in the bag, and plenty of good work during the majority of 2011, before the poor run of 2012, there was a sense of something to build upon.
However, whereas last season involved the supreme reading and recycling of Lucas, the intelligent movement and possession of Maxi and the energy of Meireles, the current midfield is pretty soporific, and the 4-4-2 fairly unimaginative at times.
Put Charlie Adam in the middle of it (Blackpool fans will attest that he was only worthwhile in 4-3-3), and it feels like an accident waiting to happen. Add Jordan Henderson to the right of it, and you get valuable playing experience for a young man with a lot of promise, but not enough end product.
Last month, Carroll had finally started to play well in a few games running, but has largely sat on the bench since then. Liverpool often move the ball better without him, but he was in the starting XI for quite a few of the good away wins earlier in the season: at Arsenal, Everton, West Brom and Wolves, plus Stoke, Chelsea and Man City in the cup. While his hold up play needs improving upon, his inclusion allows the midfield to join up.
Bellamy is another who had started to play well, but who had been out of the side since just after scoring a glut of goals; and when he did start, against Sunderland, his pace was sacrificed when substitutions were made.
All the while, under-performing players stay in the team. This is a criticism that was also labelled at Rafa Benítez, but in the case of Peter Crouch and Lucas Leiva, that faith was rewarded in the end. Managers tend to stick with players they believe in, even if it’s not coming across in their play; the idea is that it will, in the end.
In that sense, we can’t say anything too definitive. Just as so many fans were convinced that Lucas was rubbish, and “never gonna be good enough – end of!”, the passing of time brought new perception. He was always much better than given credit for, but improved significantly, too.
Charlie Adam had just started to look like reverting to a squad player with the return to fitness of Gerrard, when Gerrard got injured again. Lucas’ injury means there aren’t a lot of central midfield options. As much as I prefer Aquilani as a footballer to Adam, the Italian has just had another couple of months out with another ankle injury, so it’s hard to say he would have been the answer.
Another worry is that at this moment in time, Liverpool are not playing like a team. The bonding and man-management may be going well, and in the bigger games there is a terrific togetherness, but there are some worrying trends, too.
Suarez is increasingly going it alone up front; however, doing so in the final third, while frustrating at times, is not such a crime.
But in midfield, Adam looks for the spectacular, or to go himself with a 40-yard dribble from deep, when options are clear ahead of him. (When he loses the ball, he has effectively taken himself out of the game, as well as those who made the runs.) On a couple of occasions Adam has had a good game by keeping things simple, but they are the exception. Either he’s trying too hard to impress, or really is as lacking in game intelligence as many fear.
And even Jose Enrique, who was excellent in the first half of the season, has started overcomplicating things whenever he bursts forward, and is holding onto the ball rather than passing. He remains largely excellent defensively, but lacks ideas going forward.
On the flank, Stewart Downing continues to shoot on sight (of Row Z) from 25-35 yards but fail to attempt anything from closer in, while on the other flank, Henderson – a clever one-touch passer – will do almost anything but shoot. (That should come with  seniority.) Without people putting away the good chances that were being created, results suffered, and confidence has dropped.
As a result, the cup competitions have become the focus. I said a few weeks ago that winning the Carling Cup but coming a distant 7th won’t constitute a good season; but that a second cup final, particularly if won, would. Having said that, unless results pick up, Liverpool are in danger of drifting into the bottom half of the table.
That would make it seem like a repeat of Kenny’s time at Newcastle: come in at the halfway stage and finish the season very well indeed, followed by a disappointing full league campaign (hindered by key absentees) but winning through to a cup final. The difference is that Liverpool won their cup final, and have the chance to reach another.
I would therefore suggest we judge Dalglish when everyone is fit. Perhaps that’s unrealistic in this day and age, but I don’t think we’ve got a look at his best team yet.
Also, there’s no doubt that this remains a transitional season – it is, after all, the manager’s first full campaign, this time around. But the concern is over what we are transitioning into. Right now, that’s not entirely clear.

Monday, February 20, 2012

鄭丁賢‧並非經典,卻是突破


http://opinions.sinchew-i.com/node/22839

為這場辯論打個分數,我認為值得80分。
分數相當高,不過,這不是兩位辯論者的得分;分數其實是打給大馬政治文化的突破。
人民第一次能夠零距離的觀看不同政黨的立場,比較朝野政治人物的論述,然後,可以有自己的意見,以及結論。
這就是開放社會所需要的一個平台;不同的聲音,呈現在人民之前,讓人民來做裁決,做自己的主人。
通過這一場辯論,我們往前走了一步。
兩位辯論者參與辯論,需要有勇氣,也表現政治人物的問政責任。蔡細歷和林冠英都應該獲得肯定的掌聲,而不是當天現場出現的一些噓聲。
至於表現好不好,已經是其次;當然,他們還有進步的空間。
或許,這是政治辯論的初體驗,還沒有建立規範,兩人也缺乏這方面的經驗。雖然是依照美國兩黨政治辯論的形式,不過,在內容和素質方面,卻有一段距離。
辯論題目是“兩線制會不會成為兩種族制”。這個主題,反映當今大馬社會的兩種主流理念,也是民間的兩種思維模式。
如果依照這個主題進行,或許可以撥雲見日,幫助厘清不同的觀念。
可惜的是,辯論者有些逃離主題,也把自己鎖在特定的政治立場之內,各自表述,成為政黨的政見發表會。
給我的感覺,就像是登上小叮噹的時光機器,奔波在馬華和行動黨的政治座談會之間,不斷切換,有點喘不過氣來。
顯然,蔡林兩人都太急於壓倒對方,忙於挑出課題,攻擊對方的弱點,而無暇於辯論政黨的理念,也沒有發掘兩線制和種族主義之間的矛盾,更少了對未來選擇的啟迪。
如果是真正的美式民主辯論,從黨內初選辯論,到總統候選人辯論,著重的是理念和立場的闡述,為時局和課題找出解決之道,而不是攻擊對方的弱點,挑對方的毛病。
如果有下一場辯論,蔡林或是其他辯者,都應該注意這個不足之處。
此外,現場的許多提問者和觀眾,看來不瞭解這是一場辯論會,而當它是政黨的造勢大會。
辯論會的觀眾,應該是欣賞者,不是參與者;就好像聽一場古典音樂會,聽眾不能鼓譟和干擾,而是靜靜坐著聆聽,在適當的時候鼓掌,直到結束。
如果要叫喊,助陣,那就來錯了地方,應該保留力氣,到競選提名日再好好表現一番。
當然,觀眾提問環節也是一個敗筆;多數的提問者,黨性太強,理性太少;如果改為指定提問,由華團和媒體派出代表,提出有深度,但不是攻擊性的問題,那會更好。
這一場辯論雖然不是經典,卻是一種突破,值得肯定,應該再辦。
(星洲日報/馬荷加尼‧作者:鄭丁賢‧《星洲日報》副總編輯)

Thursday, February 2, 2012

鄭丁賢‧孔教授的狗論

http://opinions.sinchew-i.com/node/22600


2012-02-01 09:06

北京大學有一名教授,名叫孔慶東,自稱是孔老夫子的後代。
孔慶東不以學術揚名,反而是靠政治立場和罵人出名。他是大陸極左派的旗手,最看不起民主;任何維權和爭取自由的人士,在他眼中就是漢奸。
最近,孔大教授更火紅,他罵香港人是狗,罵台灣人假,罵新加坡人賤。
指香港人是“狗”,導因是一群中國人在香港地鐵車廂吃東西,有港人乘客看不過眼,挺身告知地鐵規定不准在車廂內進食,引發一場爭執。
孔大教授知道之後,替大陸同胞打抱不平,說香港人被英國統治,習慣了當走狗,現在還是狗,不是人。
還有,香港人講廣東話,不愛講普通話,是王八蛋。
而新加坡乾淨整齊,是靠法治來維持,證明新加坡人沒有素質,這種人犯賤,欠揍。
至於台灣的選舉,那是假民主,因為馬英九得票不過數百萬張,還不到半個北京多。
貴為北大教授,也是孔家後代,但言語粗俗,態度狂傲,文化低落,邏輯不通。
不過,此人是極左代表性人物,在中國大陸左派市場有廣大支持者;罵過之後,民間不乏響應者,把香港、新加坡和台灣人狂踩痛扁一番;左仔、憤青和大中國主義者取得精神上的勝利。
而被罵的港、台、新人,也進行自衛反擊;尤其是香港人,長期看不過眼大陸人士在香港的言行作風,終於引爆民情,怒罵大陸人是蝗蟲,過境香港,讓東方之珠滿目瘡痍。
大中華世界的美麗願景背後,其實是不同的制度,相異的文化,以及各自的社會和歷史背景。
孔慶東沒有能力製造分裂,但是,經他如此一搞,倒是把各地華人的自大、自卑,以及矛盾和敵視,加以突顯和放大。
當然,這位教授不能代表中國觀點,然而,卻也顯示今天大陸極左派對民主的卑視,對法治之不肖,對多元之排斥;只有將民族自尊和榮耀放在至高地位,作為道德和管理的最高指標。
在地鐵吃東西,確實違反規定,但是,因為民族尊嚴,可以不把法治放在眼裡。方言是社會的多元呈現;但是,在單元思維裡,則是王八蛋。一人一票顯示公民的平等權利;但是,在無從選擇的環境裡,倒成為了假民主。
大中華世界要有前途,必須諒解、包容,學習對方的成功經驗,以及尊重文明的制度和文化。
而孔大教授在知識領域裡,只不過是一個笑話人物。(星洲日報/馬荷加尼‧作者:鄭丁賢‧《星洲日報》副總編輯)